community
directory
books
authors
images
encyclopedia

Email:
Password:
Register

Knowledgerush Search

 

Google
  Web knowledgerush


Search for images of FUD


Message boards   Post comment

FUD

FUD is an abbreviation for Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Opponents of certain large computer corporations claim that the spreading of fear, uncertainty, and doubt is a marketing technique that these corporations consciously employ.

Defined by Gene Amdahl after he left IBM to found his own company: "FUD is the fear, uncertainty, and doubt that IBM sales people instill in the minds of potential customers who might be considering Amdahl products." The idea, of course, was to persuade buyers to go with safe IBM gear rather than with competitors' equipment. This implicit coercion was traditionally accomplished by promising that Good Things would happen to people who stuck with IBM, but Dark Shadows loomed over the future of competitors' equipment or software. After 1990 the term has become generalized to refer to any kind of disinformation used as a competitive weapon.

The term is most frequently used in relation to Microsoft. The Halloween documents (leaked internal Microsoft documents whose authenticity is not in doubt) use the term FUD to describe a potential tactic, as in "OSS is long-term credible ... FUD tactics can not be used to combat it." More recently, Microsoft has issued statements about the "viral nature" of the GNU General Public License (GPL), which are widely believed by computer industry observers to be attempts at spreading FUD. Microsoft's statements are often directed at the GNU/Linux community in particular, to discourage widespread Linux adoption, which could hurt Microsoft's marketshare.

The SCO Group's 2003 lawsuit against IBM, claiming intellectual property infringements by the open source community, is also widely regarded as being an attempt at spreading FUD.

By spreading (possibly untrue) information about the drawbacks of less well-known products, an established company can discourage decision-makers from choosing those products over its wares, regardless of the relative technical merits. This is a recognised phenomenon, epitomised by the belief of purchasing agents that nobody ever got fired for buying IBM equipment.

The result is that many companies' IT departments buy software which they know to be technically inferior because upper management is more likely to recognise the brand.

This article or an earlier version of it came from the Jargon File.

External links

Referenced By

Acronym/List | BOHICA | Control Data | Control Data Corporation | Corporate immune response | Craig Mundie | DR-DOS | DanceSafe | Disinformation | Doubt | Electrical | Electricity | Fictional technology | Gene Amdahl | Groklaw | Hallowe'en documents | Halloween document | Halloween documents | Linus Torvalds | Linux lawsuit | List of acronyms | List of general acronyms | MICROSOFT | Micro-soft | Microsoft.com | Microsoft Corporation | Microsoft Inc | OGG Vorbis | Ogg-Vorbis | Radiological warfare | SCO v. IBM | SCO v. IBM Linux lawsuit | SCO vs Linux | TLAs from EAA to HZZ | ThomasEdison | Thomas A. Edison | Thomas Alva Edison | Thomas Edision | Thomas Edison | Tove Torvalds | Vorbis | War of Currents

 

Compose Your Message

Your Email Address or Pen Name (optional):
Subject:
Your Message:
 

 

 

 

 

 

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "FUD".

 

Contact UsPrivacy Statement & Terms of Use

 
Copyright © 1999-2003 Knowledgerush.com. All rights reserved.